Rubric for Concept note (final submission and online presentation)
| |
|
Marks
|
Inadequate
|
Fair
|
Good
|
Excellent |
1.Summary
|
Clear articulation of the overall goal and rationale, meaning (or Connotation) of the proposed intervention
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2. Relevance
|
Clearly identify the "issue" or "problem" to be addressed, and clear indication of strong background research to support the identification of the problem and the proposed intervention. It should also be obvious that the proposed intervention Connects clearly within the Context of the course.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
3. Methodology and Sustainability
|
Proposed activities are plausible and "thick"* (based on solid understanding of the Complexity of local Context and needs) and that the proposed partnership will have long term effects.
*Opposite of "thin integration" or "thinegration"
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
4. Expertise and experience
|
Ability to draw on existing skills and expertise from within the group and be able to identify the strengths of the potential partner(s).
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Online presentation of the concept |
5 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
Comments (3)
Stephen Bloom said
at 12:58 am on Nov 26, 2013
I was just wondering why past experience was included for evaluation in the concept note? Are we penalized for lacking experience in our group's projects field of interest?
Hannah Song said
at 8:34 pm on Dec 2, 2013
For a quick question for the presentation of our concept note, are we only entitled to make a short video to deliver our concept note in a creative way? Are we allowed to use any other methods for the presentation criteria?
Meara Hurtig said
at 3:09 am on Dec 3, 2013
I'm not sure where to upload the video for final submission, but here's the link to watch it on youtube: http://youtu.be/ogiXWlnAom8
Please let me know if you want me to upload it to the wiki!!
You don't have permission to comment on this page.